Lupus FAQ » Lupus Arthritis » Informative reading

Informative reading

Question:

In article <19971020170801.NAA23…@ladder02.news.aol.com>, jo…@aol.com (JoyyH) writes: >I personally feel that even though your intentions were the best that the > amount and format of the info you presented in this post Sherry is not > approriate for this setting.  I welcome all comments .  This is just my > personal view as a patient who recalls the confusion I was faced with in the > early years.  This would have consumed me.

I personally feel that newsgroups are the BEST place to share this info, as it is then up for debate and analysis.  Anyone who is newly diagnosed and on the net is surely not looking at one post for all the info they need.  I know I didn’t with Ed’s FAQ, but it did give me the initial info to get my butt in gear and get to the doctor for proper diagnosis and treatment.  Would you rather we censor things here and miss helping someone else in that way?   And, BTW, many of the orgs. and docs, and even some people here on the net, manipulate available info (which is limited anyway) to make this disease fit whatever political or emotional agenda they have.  Whose "truth" shall we use?   Amie

Response:

>speaking as a newly diagnosed patient, this was not at all confusing.

I am relieved to hear this .  However not everyone has the insight or the  ability to gain the insight needed to process so much information at one time  when they are newly diagnosed.  The medical community has been very verble  about this and I personally have had to intervene on behalf of many patients  through a very prominenet SD and Lupus specialist to calm things down.      As for this info from Lue being "New" it was published in a March 1997  issue of the Digest.  I also just got off the telephone with Lue to confirm  when the Info was passed along..  It was again March 27th, !997.  Sherry  posted it at that time on the AOL Scleroderma Bulletin Board.  Again the exact  date is March 27th, 1997 it can be easily looked up.  Also all newly diagnosed  patients should make a point if interested in research to contact the  Scleroderma Organizations to get accurate info that has been first  carefully  reviewed by doctors before being passed along on a whim.  This is my opinion  only.  I work with the lupus site and Dr. Borrie  mainly and our way of  handling info is quite different.  Especially when it comes to newly diagnosed  patients.  Before the introduction of this type of information there must be a  glossary of terminology presented to provide proper understanding.  Not just  an overwhelming flood of information in clinical language. This area is  certainly not the place for clinical terminology without definition.  This  tends to make me feel that whoever posts in this style may not fully  understand what they are posting.  If they understood, then out of  consideration to the new patients who have never dealt with clinical terms  they should have put the post into laymen terms for this format. JonnellH .

Response:

Miriam, if you had frequented this group before now, you would have noticed that I post that FAQ regularly.  I had permission from Ed from the very beginning of this newsgroup to do so. The FAQ is clearly dated, as you note, so that others may understand the timing of the information. BTW, it may help in future postings if you pick one of your screen names and stick with it.  You may be confusing and frightening others who don’t recognize that you use several personas. Amie

Response:

Amie there has been too much nonsense online you will be finding in the time to  follow that everything written will have to be confirmed when given in the  spirit of information.  I and others will be watching.  My comments will not  be made without first consulting with medical professionals.  I have contacted  two prominent SD researchers and they have offered me their help.  It is time  you look at how the lupus and arthritis groups present their information.

Response:

With several items changed this article matches an article that Amie Ayaussyoff  posted right here to, the news group on Sept.26th, 1997 The original article which is a bit longer than yours but just as outdated in  its information was taken from:    SCLERODERMA F.A.Q.    Revised January 14th, 1996     by Ed Harris     ehar…@synnovation.com He is requesting that all comments be addressed to him as many items have  changed and he was not aware that he was being quoted  He is currently part of  a study and if e-mailed will elaborate  This caught him completely off guard    It is only recently that he has been able to access this news group through  his server.One item in particular is the number of patients stated who suffer  from the disease, the new numbers have dramatically changed.  "Ed Harris is  one of the original online support givers we have alot to thank him for !!!"

Response:

Mia43 (Miriam) is the only screen name I use to, post anything online with.  It  has been CLEARLY proven by AOL and others including Ed Harris that I have been  impersonated Jonell who is (JoyyH) and I have put this post together under her  name for convenience..  There is litigation in process but it seems that the  person pulling these prank impersonations got entangled yesterday and got  caught.  There is a saying. "The truth will out !"  You can contact the Lupus group and Dr. Borrie and  verify thay JoyyH is one of his patients  "Jonnell H. Genovese"  We have all  known each other since 1990.  You see Amie I am well respected in the medical  community and it was just a matter of time before it was recognized by the  doctors that I was not posting the items that were put under my name.  Since  being cleared you will be hearing alot from me in many different.  online  formats.  The most prominent SD doctors have asked me to please work with them  to straighten out some of the sites.  This one in particular with all it’s  smut.  If you look into the Lupus News Group you will find that there are so  many  intelligent postings that there is no room for the garbage that gets  printed here.    This sight is an insult to all scleroderma victims and the  medical professionals that take their precious time to attempt to educate  through the USF and other volunteer organizations. Jonell H and Miriam (AKA Mia43)     Both Jonell and I put this post up together  , no confusion if read properly                                                                                       >BTW, it may help in future postings if  you pick one of your screen names >and stick with it.  You may be confusing and frightening others who don’t >recognize that you use several personas. >Amie

Quite simple  Mia43 = Miriam     JoyyH= Jonell   we are sorry if there truly  was confusion but the e-mail that we both have recieved does not point to this  it only further acknowledges that people now have become aware of the  impersonations on their own. In fact I have  (Mia) recieved many appologies.

Response:

A tremendous amount of the info you have generously shared is terribly  outdated.  It has been on the web for well over a year.  The Iloprost study  ended a year ago and was not a success.  The drug will not become available in  the US.  As for Photopheresis and Plasmapheresus it was studied years ago and  also has never been proven effective and at present there are no intended  studies planned in the near future.  We all appreciate info on scleroderma but  to flood a format like this news group section with outdated material and so  much of it at one time can only serve to confuse people and new patients.  What you may understand due to years of having the illness others may  interpret incorrectly. >Lue shared this with me and I wanted you all to be able to read it. >Thank you Lue.

BTW-Lue shared this as part of a bonus issue for your SD Digest many months  ago. JonnelH and Miriam –  If anyone is interested in checking on the info contained  please contact the Scleroderma Research Foundation.they have the most up to  date material on current studies.  1-800-441-CURE I personally feel that even though your intentions were the best that the  amount and format of the info you presented in this post Sherry is not  approriate for this setting.  I welcome all comments .  This is just my  personal view as a patient who recalls the confusion I was faced with in the  early years.  This would have consumed me.

Response:

If you like this post and would like to receive updates from this blog, please subscribe our feed. Subscribe via RSS

Related Posts

Leave a Reply